注冊(cè) | 登錄讀書(shū)好,好讀書(shū),讀好書(shū)!
讀書(shū)網(wǎng)-DuShu.com
當(dāng)前位置: 首頁(yè)出版圖書(shū)人文社科法律法律法規(guī)民法病態(tài)性賭博法律問(wèn)題探究

病態(tài)性賭博法律問(wèn)題探究

病態(tài)性賭博法律問(wèn)題探究

定 價(jià):¥48.00

作 者: 呂冬娟 著
出版社: 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)出版社
叢編項(xiàng):
標(biāo) 簽: 暫缺

購(gòu)買(mǎi)這本書(shū)可以去


ISBN: 9787513051255 出版時(shí)間: 2019-05-01 包裝: 平裝
開(kāi)本: 16開(kāi) 頁(yè)數(shù): 184 字?jǐn)?shù):  

內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介

  因病態(tài)性賭博所增加之社會(huì)成本已逐漸成為世界上*緊迫的公共政策挑戰(zhàn)之一,有很多專(zhuān)家或?qū)W者從醫(yī)學(xué)或社會(huì)學(xué)的角度詳細(xì)論述了這一問(wèn)題。然而,從法律的角度對(duì)這一問(wèn)題的認(rèn)識(shí)還處于起步階段?;诖吮尘埃緯?shū)從法律的視角研究了病態(tài)性賭博所衍生之法律問(wèn)題,主要內(nèi)容包括:病態(tài)性賭博的概念和特征;解釋“自我隔離”制度或“自我禁入賭場(chǎng)”制度的法律考慮;從民法角度來(lái)探討博彩業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)者是否對(duì)病態(tài)賭徒承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的謹(jǐn)慎義務(wù);以刑法視角來(lái)詮釋病態(tài)性賭博所衍生之問(wèn)題;闡述負(fù)責(zé)任博彩的相關(guān)法律制度架構(gòu)及博彩業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)者的法律責(zé)任。

作者簡(jiǎn)介

  呂冬娟 女,湖南澧縣人,法學(xué)博士。澳門(mén)城市大學(xué)法學(xué)院助理教授,澳門(mén)城市大學(xué)澳門(mén)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展研究中心研究員,東亞侵權(quán)法學(xué)會(huì)(AETL)澳門(mén)法域副秘書(shū)長(zhǎng),澳門(mén)立法及司法見(jiàn)解研究會(huì)(AELJM)執(zhí)行副主編。長(zhǎng)期從事私法的研究工作,積極參與私法制度的國(guó)際學(xué)術(shù)交流活動(dòng)。主要研究領(lǐng)域?yàn)槊穹ɑA(chǔ)理論、合同法、擔(dān)保法、侵權(quán)責(zé)任法、國(guó)際商法、國(guó)際仲裁和國(guó)際投資法等。曾先后參與澳門(mén)特別行政區(qū)土地法、中國(guó)城市的社區(qū)毒品研究、東亞侵權(quán)法示范法、澳門(mén)金融安全研究等多項(xiàng)研究課題,發(fā)表學(xué)術(shù)論文數(shù)篇,出版著作多部(如《澳門(mén)道路交通事故民事責(zé)任研究》,社會(huì)科學(xué)文獻(xiàn)出版社2018年版)。

圖書(shū)目錄

Tables of Contents
Introduction
0.1 Opening remarks
0.2 Key research questions
0.3 Sequence
0.4 Methodology
Chapter I A General Introduction to Gambling and Pathological
Gambling
1.1 Background
1.1.1 The definition and the forms of gaming
1.1.2 The benefits of gambling and the costs of gambling
1.1.3 Prohibition versus legalization
1.1.4 Possible solutions for a legislator
1.1.5 A model to follow
1.2 The issue of pathological gambling
1.2.1 What is it
1.2.2 Internet gambling & pathological gambling
1.2.3 Pathological gambling among youths
1.2.4 Comments
Chapter II Legal Considerations of Self-Exclusion Program
2.1 Introduction
2.2 The legal nature of the self-exclusion program
2.3 Examples
2.3.1 USA
2.3.2 Canada—Ontario
2.3.3 New Zealand
2.3.4 Australia—Victoria
2.3.5 Singapore
2.4 Important questions
2.5 Comments
Chapter III Do Gaming Operators Owe a Duty of Care to Pathological
Gamblers
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Case study
3.3 Arguments
3.3.1 Arguments against “duty of care”
3.3.2 Arguments in favor of “duty of care”
3.4 Comments
Chapter IV The Relationship Between Pathological Gambling Disorder
and Criminal Law
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Case study
4.2.1 Pathological gambling as a criminal defense
4.2.2 Pathological gambling as a basis for sentencing mitigation
4.3 Arguments
4.3.1 Arguments in favor
4.3.2 Arguments against
4.4 Comments
Chapter V Responsible Gambling
5.1 Definition of responsible gambling
5.2 Barriers and benefits of providing socially responsible gaming
programs
5.3 Respective roles of the following three major stakeholders
5.3.1 Government
5.3.2 Gaming operators
5.3.3 Individual
5.4 Comments
Conclusions
Bibliography

本目錄推薦

掃描二維碼
Copyright ? 讀書(shū)網(wǎng) ranfinancial.com 2005-2020, All Rights Reserved.
鄂ICP備15019699號(hào) 鄂公網(wǎng)安備 42010302001612號(hào)