法官司法行為的話語(yǔ)心理學(xué)研究（英文版）

　　法官?zèng)Q策話語(yǔ)主要有調(diào)節(jié)類(lèi)、征詢類(lèi)、表征類(lèi)和定性類(lèi)等四種。但每種話語(yǔ)行為都有多種不同的實(shí)現(xiàn)形式。這表明，法官行為是結(jié)構(gòu)性與動(dòng)態(tài)性的矛盾統(tǒng)一。從法官認(rèn)同方面，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，法官這些司法話語(yǔ)行為的差異性可從法官認(rèn)同的三個(gè)層面（即話語(yǔ)性、情景性和轉(zhuǎn)移性）得到解釋?；诜ü俚恼J(rèn)同取向，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)法官?zèng)Q策行為差異可大體表現(xiàn)在三個(gè)方面：首先。法官在司法過(guò)程中是以程序?yàn)檫€是以實(shí)體內(nèi)容為。其次、法官在人際定位上是傾向于型還是友好型。很后、法官在認(rèn)知取向上是采用范疇化模式還是敘事模式。這些差異不是法官固有角色特征的屬性，而是法官在司法過(guò)程中存在狀態(tài)的具體關(guān)切體現(xiàn)。基于本研究的分析結(jié)果，本文很后提出司法公正是一種話語(yǔ)建構(gòu)的實(shí)體，存在于日常司法話語(yǔ)之中。司法行為的核心是司法過(guò)程中法官的關(guān)切狀態(tài)。法官司法行為研究的本質(zhì)就是揭示由法官認(rèn)同所體現(xiàn)的法官關(guān)切狀態(tài)。司法改革需要使法官的“純真”知識(shí)合法化。解決這個(gè)問(wèn)題的方法是提高等。

　　Zhong Cai-shun is currently a lecturer in Jiangxi Normal University. He has been working there since 2005 after he obtained his master degree from Zhejiang Normal University.From 2006 to 2009， he proceeded to pursue his PhD degree in Guangdong University of Foreign Studies， where he received his academic training in forensic linguistics. He did research on forensic phonetic science as a visiting scholar at the University of York during 2015-2016. He has so far published more than 20 research papers and one monograph. He is now a member of the specialized Forensic Linguistics council in China's Association of English and Chinese Comparative Research. His research interests include legal discourse analysis， forensic speaker identification and sociophonetics.