鄭睦凡，女，滿族，1992年生。武漢大學(xué)心理學(xué)系講師。作者于2008年-2012年在武漢大學(xué)心理學(xué)系學(xué)習(xí)，獲學(xué)士學(xué)位；2012年-2015年于浙江大學(xué)心理與行為科學(xué)系學(xué)習(xí)，獲碩士學(xué)位；2015年-2019年于英國倫敦大學(xué)學(xué)院（University College London）心理學(xué)系學(xué)習(xí)，并獲博士學(xué)位。2019年9月起任教于武漢大學(xué)心理學(xué)系。作者的研究方向?yàn)樯鐣睦韺W(xué)，擅長實(shí)驗(yàn)的研究方法，長期從事權(quán)力、道德領(lǐng)域的實(shí)證研究，曾在國內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)刊物上發(fā)表多篇相關(guān)主題論文。
圖書目錄
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Power 1.1.1 What is Power 1.1.2 Methods and Measures in Power Research 1.1.3 Theories of Power 1.1.4 Consequences of Power 1.1.5 Power and Morality 1.1.6 Summary and Outlook 1.2 Moral Judgments 1.2.1 Deontology and Utilitarianism 1.2.2 Moral Dilemmas 1.2.3 Intuitionist and Rationalist Models 1.2.4 Influencing Factors in Moral Judgments 1.2.5 Summary and Outlook 1.3 Power and Moral Judgments 1.3.1 Aims of the Current Studies 1.3.2 Power and Moral Judgments in Different Contexts 1.3.3 The Role of Cognitive Processing Style 1.3.4 The Role of Goal Focus 1.3.5 Summary and Outlook 1.4 Present Research 1.4.1 Is the Association Between Power and Moral Judgments Generalisable 1.4.2 How Does the Presence of Harm Modify the Association Between Power and Moral Thinking Style 1.4.3 What Is the Role of Processing Style on the Links Between Power and Moral Judgments 1.4.4 Understanding the Link Between Power and Moral Judgments With the Situated Theory of Power-the Role of Goals Focus Chapter 2 The Replications And Extensions Of Previous Findings About Power And Moral Judgments 2.1 Replication of Previous Findings 2.1.1 Overview 2.1.2 Study 1: Replication Study of Lammers and Stapel (2009) 2.1.3 Study 2: Power and Moral Judgments in an Organisational Environment 2.1.4 Summary and Outlook 2.2 How Harm Modifies the Association Between Power and Moral Thinking Style 2.2.1 Overviews 2.2.2 Study 3: Moral Reasoning in the Presence of Harm 2.2.3 Study 4: Moral Reasoning in the Presence of Impersonal Harm 2.2.4 Summary and outlook Chapter 3 Power,Cognitive Processing Style and Moral Judgments 3.1 Overview 3.2 Study 5:Cognitive Load Increases the Preference for Deontology of the Powerless 3.3 Study 6:Deliberative Thinking Increases Utilitarian Judgments Among the Powerful 3.4 Summary and Outlook Chapter 4 Power Increases Moral Flexibility Via Focal Goal Commitment 4.1 Overviews 4.2 Study 7:Goal Focus Modifies How Power Affects Moral Judgments 4.3 Study 8: How Power Affects Moral Judgments with Personal Chronic Goals 4.4 Study 9: Power Increases Deontological Judgments via the Chronic Goal of Maintaining Authority 4.5 Study 10: The Mediating Role of Goal Commitment 4.6 Summary and Outlook Chapter 5 General Discussion 5.1 Overview 5.2 Summary of the Present Research 5.2.1 Replication 5.2.2 How Harm Modifies the Association Between Power and Moral Judgments 5.2.3 Power, Cognitive Processing Style and Moral Judgments 5.2.4 Power Increases Moral Flexibility via Goal Focus 5.2.5 Experimental Design 5.2.6 Effect Size 5.3 Implications of the Present Findings 5.3.1 Power and Moral Thinking Style 5.3.2 Theories and Research of Power 5.3.3 Theories of Moral Judgments 5.3.4 Applied Implications 5.4 Limitations 5.4.1 Boundary Conditions for Power Differences in Moral Judgments 5.4.2 Further Study About the Role of Cognitive Processing Style 5.4.3 Goal Focus 5.4.4 The Utilitarian Judgments of the Powerless 5.4.5 Manipulation of Power 5.5 Conclusion Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Appendix 7 References
鄂公網(wǎng)安備 42010302001612號 